-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: proportion_confint only has two-sided confidence intervals, no "alternative" option #9239
Comments
@josef-pkt |
Yes, we want to add the Note, "binomtest" will have different one-sided intervals which should be easy to compute. pull request would be welcome. |
@josef-pkt |
see
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/646445/multinomial-one-sided-confidence-intervals
same for multinomial_proportions_confint
I think for proportion_confint it should be just one interval at 2*alpha, except for "beta-test" which is minlike, and the one-sided will correspond to one side of equal-tail intervals.
I don't have a guess on one-sided interval for multinomial_proportions_confint. (too long ago). But it might be based on an equal-tail derivation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: