New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coin selection using more input than needed #9022
Labels
topic-wallet 👛
related to wallet.py, or maybe address_synchronizer.py/coinchooser.py
Comments
Hmm. Not sure. Normally the coinchooser would not add unnecessary inputs atm.
|
SomberNight
added
the
topic-wallet 👛
related to wallet.py, or maybe address_synchronizer.py/coinchooser.py
label
Apr 24, 2024
Afaik was the most regular type of transaction possible. RBF by default, No coin selection, No pay to many. Will follow up if something like that happens again. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'd like to know why did electrum use two input while the smallest one was large enough.
The transaction paid more than 60$ in fees, not really a good time to consolidate.
There was 5 other input that were large enough for 0.0579265 on their own, Why chose two?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: