New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Representation of implicit (library) calls #21

Open

4 tasks

mcopik opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 0 comments

Labels

Collaborator

mcopik commented Apr 17, 2020 •

edited

Loading

Currently we have a correct representation of library calls but it's not perfect.

Implicit calls have no representation in memory, instead they rely on caller function.
Caller function shouldn't have any storage for implicit calls loops
These calls should create normal call registration so the caller creates the function entry.
Fix loop structure Implicit calls in nested loop #20

mcopik added the bug label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment