Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project / Quality Status? #3

Open
prologic opened this issue Jan 1, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Project / Quality Status? #3

prologic opened this issue Jan 1, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@prologic
Copy link

prologic commented Jan 1, 2018

Is this project still considered "work in progress"? Who currently uses this to successfully perform remote backups of their ZFS pools in any serious form? Thanks!

@someone1
Copy link
Owner

someone1 commented Jan 4, 2018

I've been using it as my primary backup solution for months now - haven't really had time to add new features but hope to soon.

@someone1 someone1 closed this as completed Jan 4, 2018
@prologic
Copy link
Author

prologic commented Jan 5, 2018 via email

@someone1
Copy link
Owner

someone1 commented Jan 5, 2018

Sure, not a problem. I've personally uploaded thousands of snapshots and periodically test my backups to restore to a random point in time and validate the results. I have yet to run into any issues in that regard through the schedule and complexity of my backups.

@someone1 someone1 reopened this Jan 5, 2018
@prologic
Copy link
Author

prologic commented Jan 8, 2018

@someone1 Re your previous comment here; would you mind documenting your backup/restore/verification workflow in a Wiki page? That would be super handy to learn from what you've done. (I don't want to pollute the project with too many open issues!)

@someone1
Copy link
Owner

Yes I'd be happy to when I find some time. I've been meaning to expand documentation on usage through the Wiki feature anyway, adding use-cases/examples is a great idea.

@auberginepop
Copy link

auberginepop commented Oct 9, 2018

Interesting project!
Am I right in saying that with no delete feature the size of your remote storage is always increasing. You don't have the Duplicity features of specifying regular full backups and how many full/incremental backups to keep?

@someone1
Copy link
Owner

I have not implemented an auto-prune like feature that duplicity has. I guess I assumed this could be accomplished by the lifecycle rules found at most cloud storage providers.

If this is something you'd like to see, please open a new feature request and I can look into it!

@jsirianni
Copy link

This issue was opened a while ago, what are the feelings in 2020? I will try and kick the tires on this soon.

I currently depend on rclone to manage terrabytes of backups to B2, among 8-12 systems.

@someone1
Copy link
Owner

The current software works well for my company's production use so I'm supporting this project through my personal time. I do squash bugs ASAP but my track record for adding new features isn't stellar (apologies)!

I hope to put a new release out soon with a few features that have been more/less ready, add more testing, and close out some of the other open issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants