-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'erd -y iflat --sort size --dirs-only' does not sort as expected; also: should the order of the params matter? #224
Comments
Off to investigate |
That's what I was thinking and makes perfect sense to me. @solidiquis - is this comfortably feasible for a future |
Yes I'm working on it today actually :) Edit: the next release should be out later this week. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
erd -y iflat --sort size --dirs-only
does not appear to sort the dirs properly.My guess is that it's sorting the non-dirs,
-y iflat
output first and then applying the--dirs-only
"filter"... but I've not tested nor investigated my guess, so it (my guess) may not be worth much.The order of the
-y, --sort, --dirs-only
parameters seems to have no effect, but I may not have tried every combination. Broader question: do we want the order to matter? I propose it should not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: