Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Be able to put in the media URL individually and directly #328

Open
Treasure522 opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Treasure522
Copy link

Treasure522 commented Apr 12, 2024

Hello! Thanks a lot for doing this project! It is very much appreciated. I have seen an issue arise when it comes to bundled content. At times, I've noticed not everything within the bundle being downloaded. The videos in question usually have a preview video before them and I wonder if maybe the other videos are being picked up as duplicates of the previews? Not sure, but I do have a possible solution to that and the issue of generally not being able to download a individual video if it is within a bundle.

If it were possible to just put in a media url, ( I am able to find those for each video beginning with "https:// cdn3. onlyfans. com/" and ending in ".mpd" ) we would be able to download videos truly individually, even if they are in a bundle, or even if they don't have a "Post url" like the message media don't. (The message videos do have post urls if you open them in another tab or window using your gallery, they just don't actually pull up the videos for some reason.)

I tried putting the media url in the section to download a single post, but it came back invalid url (probably because it is only looking for post urls to then find the media itself.)

Anyways, having the functionality to put in the media urls individually would be amazing.

@sim0n00ps
Copy link
Owner

sim0n00ps commented Apr 16, 2024

Just to explain, any preview media for PPV messages as an example will be put into the Free/Images or Free/Videos folder. If you unlock a message then that content that you've unlocked will be put into Paid/Images or Paid/Videos. So to summarise the previews will be classed as free and the actual content you unlock is classed as Paid. The duplicate checks are based on the ID of the media so if in the metadata it says it's downloaded already then it will be skipped. Yes having a feature for the cdn URL's could be useful and it can definitely be done, just hard to find time to work on this ATM.

@Treasure522
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the supplemental information!
Woo! I'm glad you agree the new feature could be useful. Definitely no rush, just happy it could be something to look forward to at some time. :D

@sim0n00ps sim0n00ps added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 23, 2024
@topzs123
Copy link

Just to explain, any preview media for PPV messages as an example will be put into the Free/Images or Free/Videos folder. If you unlock a message then that content that you've unlocked will be put into Paid/Images or Paid/Videos. So to summarise the previews will be classed as free and the actual content you unlock is classed as Paid. The duplicate checks are based on the ID of the media so if in the metadata it says it's downloaded already then it will be skipped. Yes having a feature for the cdn URL's could be useful and it can definitely be done, just hard to find time to work on this ATM.

Hey bro... how do you fix the skipping problem you mention above as "The duplicate checks are based on the ID of the media so if in the metadata it says it's downloaded already then it will be skipped."

i´m trying to download some free messages but it keeps skipping one, the strange thing is that the program shows 3 messages as downloaded but when you enter the folder there is one missing, i´ve tried deleting metadata but keeps skipping that... any idea?
ex

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants