Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C090446, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 52e, v4563\x00 #37

Open
easy-why-not opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@easy-why-not
Copy link

Hello everyone I get a similar error. Is it caused by the fact that I am incorrectly transmitting authorization data or something else?

@shaozi
Copy link
Owner

shaozi commented Oct 18, 2022

It is probably a bad password.

Returns when username is valid but password/credential is invalid.

@shaozi
Copy link
Owner

shaozi commented Oct 18, 2022

reference of code 52e is here:

https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/Common%20Active%20Directory%20Bind%20Errors

@shaozi shaozi added the question Further information is requested label Nov 11, 2022
@fuzztooth
Copy link

I'm encountering this same issue with 100% correct credentials. I have no idea why. The .NET variant I have works just fine. Same ldap server location, same domain.

@cmanage1
Copy link

I'm encountering this same issue with 100% correct credentials. I have no idea why. The .NET variant I have works just fine. Same ldap server location, same domain.

I have the same issue. Have you found a solution?

@fuzztooth
Copy link

I'm encountering this same issue with 100% correct credentials. I have no idea why. The .NET variant I have works just fine. Same ldap server location, same domain.

I have the same issue. Have you found a solution?

I switched out to ldapjs without this wrapper library. It's all working as intended now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants