-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tonal Balance, Dynamic EQ, Intensity Analysis, Wetness % #40
Comments
To further improve the process (lots of ideas flowing today), some of the mixing process as well as the mastering could be taken into account. If source separation were applied to the reference, you could allow uploading of mixgroups/stems of your track. From there, the levels could be matched more accurately. Additional best practices could be applied around sidechaining of the mix groups based on the kick in the drums. Suffice to say, I would love to help contribute to this project. I have been producing and programming for 10+ years. |
Hello! Thank you for your interest in Matchering. I can only share some materials: This video explains how current matchering works: This is the root core of Matchering: Thanks again! 😍 |
Getting a similar tonal balance on the most high energy (and low energy) sections of a track is crucial for matching a sound.. as well as the other items that this library aims for. This could possibly be achieved with a dynamic EQ with N bands. Applying the matching of the values already compared within these bands may improve the result.
If it would be possible to identify intensity levels of a song and apply these parameters to corresponding sections of the input song, the result may also be substantially better.
Being able to tweak the percentage application of these values would be very useful as well. (wetness)
I'd like to help work on these features if you can point me in the right direction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: