You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Running seaweedfs on 3 host system(HA) 0, 1, 2, with one master, volume and filer on each instance. The cluster runs fine. Then we replace host 2 with a new host and form a new cluster. When running cluster.ps or cluster.check, the cluster is fine. But when checking "s3cmd ls" in new host, no bucket is coming whereas host 0 and 1 show all the data.
List the command line to start "weed master", "weed volume", "weed filer", "weed s3", "weed mount".
OS version Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
output of weed version 3.63
if using filer, show the content of filer.toml not using filer.toml
Expected behavior
s3cmd ls should show same output in all container
Additional context
As a workaround, I have saved metadata from container 0(fs.meta.save -o filer.meta) and loaded it to container 2 (fs.meta.load filer.meta)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
Running seaweedfs on 3 host system(HA) 0, 1, 2, with one master, volume and filer on each instance. The cluster runs fine. Then we replace host 2 with a new host and form a new cluster. When running cluster.ps or cluster.check, the cluster is fine. But when checking "s3cmd ls" in new host, no bucket is coming whereas host 0 and 1 show all the data.
System Setup
weed version
3.63filer.toml
not using filer.tomlExpected behavior
s3cmd ls should show same output in all container
Additional context
As a workaround, I have saved metadata from container 0(fs.meta.save -o filer.meta) and loaded it to container 2 (fs.meta.load filer.meta)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: