Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest adding 馃敆 emoji to document early-bound references? #3

Open
sancarn opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Suggest adding 馃敆 emoji to document early-bound references? #3

sancarn opened this issue May 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request postponed postpone activity until list is developed

Comments

@sancarn
Copy link
Owner

sancarn commented May 28, 2022

I find myself avoiding early-bound references where possible, mainly because of their version instability. Is this something others would be interested in?

We'd be talking about references other than VBE7.dll, Excel.exe, stdole2.tlb, MSO.dll, FM20.dll ofc

E.G. If a library requires an early-bound reference to Scripting.Dictionary and VBScript.Regexp then we'd have the following:

* [馃柤][p_win][猸愶笍][a_all][馃敆](# "Scripting.Dictionary;VBScript.Regexp") SomeVBALibrary - Does something

However libraries which create Late-bound objects like:

set rx = CreateObject("VBScript.Regexp")

wouldn't have to include the emoji

@KallunWillock
Copy link
Contributor

KallunWillock commented May 28, 2022

Do you have a specific example? I understand the hesitation around early-bound references, but perhaps adding the emoji or not is something to consider at a later stage? Not least because it's going to require a whole lot of thinking and work on my part when submitting links for inclusion to the list! 馃槃

@sancarn
Copy link
Owner Author

sancarn commented May 28, 2022

Do you have an example?

Added to the main post

but perhaps adding the emoji or not is something to consider at a later stage?

Yes, agreed. I'd suggest we look at automating the process for the links we have already, but do so at a later stage when the list is more established 馃槉

@sancarn sancarn added the enhancement New feature or request label May 28, 2022
@KallunWillock
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, agreed. I'd suggest we look at automating the process when the list is more established 馃槉

Good plan. Now if only there was a language one could use to automate doing things...

@sancarn sancarn added the postponed postpone activity until list is developed label May 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request postponed postpone activity until list is developed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants