Replies: 1 comment
-
Based on the information you've provided and the context from the LlamaIndex repository, it seems like the issue you're encountering might be due to limitations in handling large datasets efficiently or accurately. The chain of table process in LlamaIndex is marked as beta, indicating that there may still be issues or inefficiencies in processing large or complex datasets. This could be due to several reasons, such as memory constraints, limitations in the underlying algorithms, or inefficiencies in the data processing pipeline. Here are some potential approaches to resolve this issue:
The specific implementation of the chain of table process in the LlamaIndex codebase involves a series of steps to dynamically construct and execute a sequence of operations on a table to answer a given question. This process is encapsulated within the Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find specific information about the maximum number of records that the chain of table process in LlamaIndex can handle efficiently without missing any records, or the exact error or issue that occurs when the chain of table process in LlamaIndex tries to process datasets with 400+ records. If you could provide more details about the error messages or exceptions you're encountering, it would be helpful in diagnosing and addressing the issue. I hope this information helps! If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask. Sources
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
https://github.com/run-llama/llama-hub/blob/main/llama_hub/llama_packs/tables/chain_of_table/chain_of_table.ipynb
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions