Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] electrode contribution in EEG input #218

Open
lnalborczyk opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

[question] electrode contribution in EEG input #218

lnalborczyk opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@lnalborczyk
Copy link

Hi all,

let me first thank the developer(s) for creating and maintaining keras-vis 馃憦

I have a newbie question about the best way to visualise the most useful parts of my input data for a regression task.

I have input EEG data in the form of 5D tensor of shape (N_examples, 94_time_frames, 16_electrodes, 16_electrodes, 26 frequency bins) which I'm using to predict a 3D target of shape (N_examples, 94 time frames, 40 frequency bins). Each output is a mel-spectrogram (i.e., a spectral representation of a speech signal). I have trained the following model (a ConvLSTM) by minimising the MSE between the original and predicted spectrogram.

Model: "sequential"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv_lst_m2d_52 (ConvLSTM2D) (None, 94, 16, 16, 16)    10816     
_________________________________________________________________
batch_normalization_49 (Batc (None, 94, 16, 16, 16)    64        
_________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_45 (LeakyReLU)   (None, 94, 16, 16, 16)    0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_36 (Dropout)         (None, 94, 16, 16, 16)    0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv_lst_m2d_53 (ConvLSTM2D) (None, 94, 16, 16, 32)    24704     
_________________________________________________________________
batch_normalization_50 (Batc (None, 94, 16, 16, 32)    128       
_________________________________________________________________
leaky_re_lu_46 (LeakyReLU)   (None, 94, 16, 16, 32)    0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_37 (Dropout)         (None, 94, 16, 16, 32)    0         
_________________________________________________________________
time_distributed_60 (TimeDis (None, 94, 8192)          0         
_________________________________________________________________
time_distributed_61 (TimeDis (None, 94, 40)            327720    
=================================================================
Total params: 363,432
Trainable params: 363,336
Non-trainable params: 96
_________________________________________________________________

From there, I would like to identify / visualise the "most useful" electrodes in my 16-by-16 grid of electrodes for (correctly) predicting my output, that is, for correctly predicting the power in some frequency bin and some time frame (i.e., which electrode contribute the most in reducing the error).

My approach has been to use visualize_activation as follows:

activation_map = visualize_activation(
    model, layer_idx = -1, filter_indices = None
    )

and then to average this idealised input over time frames and frequency bins to obtain a 16-by-16 matrix (representing my grid of electrodes).

However, I'm a bit unsure that this really gives me what I'm really looking for...

Does someone have any idea or suggestion?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant