Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undocumented --colorized option for pyreverse in 3.2.0-dev0 docs #9573

Open
doublethefish opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
Documentation 📗 Good first issue Friendly and approachable by new contributors Help wanted 🙏 Outside help would be appreciated, good for new contributors

Comments

@doublethefish
Copy link
Contributor

Bug description

In latest docs (3.2.0-dev-0) at time of writing there was no documentation for the --colorized option:
https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pyreverse.html

I raise this issue because we've had a PR opened to integrate the option in a down-stream tool:
[sphinx-pyreverse](https://github.com/alendit/sphinx-pyreverse)

Configuration

No response

Command used

open https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pyreverse.html

Pylint output

n/a

Expected behavior

That the feature be documented :)

Pylint version

pylint 3.2.0-dev

OS / Environment

n/a

Additional dependencies

n/a
@doublethefish doublethefish added the Needs triage 📥 Just created, needs acknowledgment, triage, and proper labelling label Apr 27, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added Help wanted 🙏 Outside help would be appreciated, good for new contributors Good first issue Friendly and approachable by new contributors Documentation 📗 and removed Needs triage 📥 Just created, needs acknowledgment, triage, and proper labelling labels Apr 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation 📗 Good first issue Friendly and approachable by new contributors Help wanted 🙏 Outside help would be appreciated, good for new contributors
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants