Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

combination with pouchdb-find possible? #29

Open
johnfakeacc opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

combination with pouchdb-find possible? #29

johnfakeacc opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@johnfakeacc
Copy link

Hey Nolan,

thanks for the great bits! Is it possible to combine transform() with pouchdb-find?

Any tips or tricks?

Thanks a lot!
Alex

@nolanlawson
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately it's not implemented. I think probably the best course of action would be to add find() support to this plugin, and then require users to apply pouchdb-find before transform-pouch, but I admit it's tricky.

@ravishan110
Copy link

ravishan110 commented Apr 19, 2018

@nolanlawson Any update on this enhancement? This would really be a very helpful enhancement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants