-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Line styling not recognized when using ELK #340
Labels
PlantUML forum/issue
Issue reported to forum/plantuml, wait for final solution
Comments
Hi @StephanPirnbaum, thank you for the finding, but I think your conclusion is wrong. I think it is elk related, I can reproduce the problem without C4 too. Samples see below. I entered a bug in the PlantUML forum BR Helmut |
Hi @kirchsth thank you for the fast investigation and reply. You're right, I was not considering using skinparam which would explain the difference to my example. I can confirm your conclusion. |
kirchsth
changed the title
Styling not recognized when using ELK
Line styling not recognized when using ELK
Mar 9, 2024
kirchsth
added
the
PlantUML forum/issue
Issue reported to forum/plantuml, wait for final solution
label
Apr 29, 2024
kirchsth
added
PlantUML forum/issue
Issue reported to forum/plantuml, wait for final solution
and removed
PlantUML forum/issue
Issue reported to forum/plantuml, wait for final solution
labels
May 27, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm using C4-PlantUML with ELK, as it regularly produces better outputs.
However, I ran into an issue when using e.g. lineColor or lineStyle.
In the following example, the relation defined using standard PlantUML syntax is correctly rendered, whereas using the C4-PlantUML it is not.
This leads me to the conclusion that ELK itself has no issues with styling lines (which would have had me wonder, tbh).
When not using ELK, the example is working, however.
For me, that looks like an issue of the combination C4-PlantUML syntax and ELK.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: