You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using license choice (either for package or repository) to select one of two available licenses, e.g.:
license_choices:
repository_license_choices:
- given: "Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-only"
choice: "Apache-2.0"
The Web App report's table shows "Apache-2.0" as effective, "Apache-2.0, LGPL-2.1-only" as detected license, as expected.
However, the NOTICE_DEFAULT still lists both licenses:
Package: net.java.dev.jna:jna:5.3.1
The following copyrights and licenses were found in the source code of this package:
Apache License
[...]
--
GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
[...]
Note: There is no copyright as there was no scan. The analyzer already lists the licenses (from Maven).
We currently work around this issue by concluding the license with a curation instead of choosing it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using license choice (either for package or repository) to select one of two available licenses, e.g.:
The Web App report's table shows "Apache-2.0" as effective, "Apache-2.0, LGPL-2.1-only" as detected license, as expected.
However, the NOTICE_DEFAULT still lists both licenses:
Note: There is no copyright as there was no scan. The analyzer already lists the licenses (from Maven).
We currently work around this issue by concluding the license with a curation instead of choosing it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: