Wrong coordinates in Florida

[eruci]

statewide2-addresses-state.geojson:{"type":"Feature","properties":{"hash":"88f3f541c169e297","number":"25","street":"RICKEY AVE NE","unit":"","city":"FORT WALTON BEACH","district":"OKALOOSA","region":"","postcode":"32547","id":""},"geometry":{"type":"Point","coordinates":[-86.3611298,30.2635127]}}

"[-86.3611298,30.2635127]" in in the open sea.

[arch0345]

The statewide datasets for Florida were removed in #6554 because of its inaccurate data, however it looks like this hasn't been reflected in batch.openaddresses.io. I recommend using the geojson for Okaloosa County (https://batch.openaddresses.io/job/332479)

[eruci]

The statewide datasets for Florida were removed in #6554 because of its inaccurate data, however it looks like this hasn't been reflected in batch.openaddresses.io. I recommend using the geojson for Okaloosa County (https://batch.openaddresses.io/job/332479)

That one is wrong too.
got (lon=-86.584983,lat=30.8229463,num=2429,str=DAKOTA WAY,unit=,city=CRESTVIEW,dist=,reg=,post=32536,id=,hash=113b5ccee8a050b1) from |-86.584983, 30.8229463, 113b5ccee8a050b1, 2429, DAKOTA WAY, , CRESTVIEW, , , 32536, |

This is 16.6 miles off / the correct latitude,longitude must be: 30°49'21.8"N 86°35'06.0"W

[arch0345]

The statewide datasets for Florida were removed in #6554 because of its inaccurate data, however it looks like this hasn't been reflected in batch.openaddresses.io. I recommend using the geojson for Okaloosa County (https://batch.openaddresses.io/job/332479)

That one is wrong too. got (lon=-86.584983,lat=30.8229463,num=2429,str=DAKOTA WAY,unit=,city=CRESTVIEW,dist=,reg=,post=32536,id=,hash=113b5ccee8a050b1) from |-86.584983, 30.8229463, 113b5ccee8a050b1, 2429, DAKOTA WAY, , CRESTVIEW, , , 32536, |

This is 16.6 miles off / the correct latitude,longitude must be: 30°49'21.8"N 86°35'06.0"W

This is where it shows this address in QGIS, which seems consistent with what GeoHack shows for the lat/lon provided above:

https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?params=30_49_21.8_N_86_35_06.0_W

[eruci]

My bad. This one looks fine. The only issue now is that the bad data is part of the default download file.