Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

review method/property names and API calling sequences for potential Pythonicity improvements (or consistency improvements as in the case of diameters methods vs. dry_diamaters property) #216

Open
slayoo opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

review method/property names and API calling sequences for potential Pythonicity improvements (or consistency improvements as in the case of diameters methods vs. dry_diamaters property) #216

slayoo opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@slayoo
Copy link
Member

slayoo commented May 17, 2023

Examples to consider:

  • aero_particle.set_vols([3, 2, 1]) -> aero_particle.vols = [3,2,1]
  • aero_particle.zero() -> aero_particle = 0
  • aero_particle.approx_crit_rel_humid(env_state) -> aero_particle.crit_rel_humid(env_state, approx=True)
@github-actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

@github-actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

@slayoo slayoo reopened this Nov 18, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

@slayoo slayoo reopened this Feb 22, 2024
@slayoo slayoo changed the title review method/property names and API calling sequences for potential Pythonicity improvements review method/property names and API calling sequences for potential Pythonicity improvements (or consistency improvements as in the case of diameters methods vs. dry_diamaters property) May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@slayoo