New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why does 'ls-remote' start from the bottom of versions and not the top? #3216
Comments
Because that’s how they’re listed on the remote server, so it would be a lot slower to reverse the entire download - you’d end up waiting more time. |
i mean you can just list the latest major, or |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@ljharb Thx for responding. If it's the remote that delivers the list in a badly sorted way, can we somehow raise a ticket there? Wherever that is. |
You certainly could file an issue on nodejs/release requesting the order be inverted - although that would probably break lots of version manager users, so it’s only really practical as a separate index file, which probably won’t be worth it since it’d be two sources of truth. |
😢😭😭 |
@raphaellueckl I'm actually quite glad that it is this way, since on my machine the listing is instant and I don't have to scroll some 18 pages to get to the latest versions. But if you really prefer it in reverse order nvs seems to have it that way. |
[Sorry for removing the issue template, but none of the points made sense for this ticket.]
I always wonder why 'ls-remote' doesn't start from the newest version, which mostly would allow for almost instant CTRL+C without waiting half a minute for the complete list. Is there any particular reason for this? Usually I am always too little bothered to mention it somewhere but today I thought that this has been the case for several years now and it finally should be discussed. :)
Seriously, who wants to install the node versions below 1? Below 10? Below 15?.... That ordering should be descending in my humble opinion.
Thanks for this awesome product! 🚀
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: