Inconsistent behavior between delete and select operations for the same text-object

[ghostbuster91]

Describe the bug
Deleting a scala function using function.outer text object in some cases deletes also the next function, while using the same text-object to select code always highlights correctly only a single function.

To Reproduce
Given the following code:

object Outer {

  object Inner {

    override def methodA(): String =
      "some text"

    override def methodB(): String = ""

  }
}

and the cursor on methodA selecting the function outer object using:
lua require("nvim-treesitter.textobjects.select").select_textobject('@function.outer', 'textobjects', 'x')

results in:

However if we try to call the same object but with a delete operation it results in both methods getting deleted:

Expected behavior
I would expect both operators - delete and select to work in a consistent way. Especially deleting using @fuction.outer should only delete a single function.

Output of :checkhealth nvim-treesitter

nvim-treesitter: require("nvim-treesitter.health").check()

Installation ~
- WARNING `tree-sitter` executable not found (parser generator, only needed for :TSInstallFromGrammar, not required for :TSInstall)
- WARNING `node` executable not found (only needed for :TSInstallFromGrammar, not required for :TSInstall)
- OK `git` executable found.
- OK `gcc` executable found. Selected from { "gcc", "cc", "gcc", "clang", "cl", "zig" }
  Version: gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
- OK Neovim was compiled with tree-sitter runtime ABI version 14 (required >=13). Parsers must be compatible with runtime ABI.

OS Info:
{
  machine = "x86_64",
  release = "6.1.52",
  sysname = "Linux",
  version = "#1-NixOS SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Sep  6 20:27:03 UTC 2023"
} ~

Parser/Features         H L F I J
  - bash                ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
  - c                   ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - comment             ✓ . . . .
  - devicetree          ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - dockerfile          ✓ . . . ✓
  - go                  ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - graphql             ✓ . . ✓ ✓
  - hocon               ✓ . . . ✓
  - html                ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - java                ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - javascript          ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - json                ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ .
  - kotlin              ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
  - lua                 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - markdown            ✓ . ✓ ✓ ✓
  - nix                 ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
  - python              ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - query               ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - rust                ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - scala               ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
  - scheme              ✓ . ✓ . ✓
  - smithy              ✓ . . . .
  - sql                 ✓ . . ✓ ✓
  - typescript          ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
  - vim                 ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
  - vimdoc              ✓ . . . ✓
  - xml                 ✓ . ✓ ✓ ✓
  - yaml                ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

  Legend: H[ighlight], L[ocals], F[olds], I[ndents], In[j]ections
         +) multiple parsers found, only one will be used
         x) errors found in the query, try to run :TSUpdate {lang} ~

Output of nvim --version

NVIM v0.9.2
Build type: Release
LuaJIT 2.1.1693350652

   system vimrc file: "$VIM/sysinit.vim"
  fall-back for $VIM: "
/nix/store/1b4pbg130cdq5pjyi7vxqqrf7nqh63a5-neovim-unwrapped-0.9.2/share/nvim
"

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

while trying to minimize the reproduction example I found following interesting cases:
If we remove the inner object but leave the indentation intact, both functions will be deleted:

but if we format the code (fix the redundant indentations) the delete operation will work correctly.

After compacting the first function to a single line it also works correctly:

It also works if the function that is being deleted is defined using braces:

treesitter-scala rev: 70afdd5632d57dd63a960972ab25945e353a52f6