Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use existing public 2y builds as “representative” trees in our reports #164

Open
3 tasks
Tracked by #130
huddlej opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks
Tracked by #130
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@huddlej
Copy link
Contributor

huddlej commented May 13, 2024

The nextflu-private builds include all strains with available titer data which makes them less useful for metrics like LBI or looking at regional frequencies. We make separate representative builds for each lineage, but we should just use the public builds since those builds use representative sampling already. To use these public builds in our reports, we need to make the following changes:

  • Remove representative builds from the nextflu-private build configuration
  • Replace references to those representative builds in the narrative Markdowns with references to builds on the date of each report @2023-11-17
  • Update the nextstrain-public build config to use the same subclade colors for all lineages that we use in the private reports, so we display consistent colors throughout reports across datasets. This step will require separate Auspice config JSONs for HA and NA for the 2y builds and will probably require splitting out the 2y builds into their own blocks of the build config YAML.
@huddlej huddlej added the enhancement New feature or request label May 13, 2024
@huddlej huddlej mentioned this issue May 13, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant