New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compatibility issue with Row vs IRow #291
Comments
I am bit confused now. IRow is marked as deprecated and hints we should use Row instead. But Row is a class. And ActiveRow does not extend Row but implements deprecated IRow. So static analysis either complains about use of deprecated IRow (and suggest replacing it with Row) or Row is used and type hierarchy breaks. What is recommended solution here? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Version: 3.1.5
Bug Description
Compatibility of IRow and Row is causing confusion of static analysers even when compatibility files are processed
Expected Behavior
IRow and Row should be treaded as aliasesPossible Solution
compatibility files should define all renamed interfaces as aliasesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: