✨ Initial support for low powered devices with other architectures #566
Comments
|
The issue has been unlocked and is now ready for dev. If you would like to work on this issue, you can comment to have it assigned to you. You can learn more in our contributing guide https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx/blob/rolling/CONTRIBUTING.md |
…tectures (#566) - Add 2 profiles with binary size reduction feature to allow devices with low storage to compile/build the app with smaller size. - Add 3 profiles to allow devices with low powered cpus or other architectures like arm to compile apps using less cpu usage. - Add 6 profiles with hybrid of both for both low powered cpu and low storage devices.
|
Please release a docker image which can support arm64 platform. |
Sorry for the late reply. Also, we would suggest you also open a feature request issue for this. So that we can work on that in the future releases soon. 🙂 |
Description
Work Expected From The Issue
Provide initial support for low powered devices with other architectures by providing different cargo profiles to support different architectures.
The issue expects the following files to be changed/modified:
Cargo.tomlNote
All the files that are expected to be changed are located under the codebase (
websurfxdirectory).Reason Behind These Changes
The reason behind having these changes is to lay the initial groundwork of foundational support for low powered devices with other architectures, and which can be in future leveraged to expand support of the app to other architectures with further improvements and features provided in the code geared towards this.
Screenshots
No response
Do you want to work on this issue?
Yes
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: