Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux / MacOS versions? #35

Open
LeBaux opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Linux / MacOS versions? #35

LeBaux opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@LeBaux
Copy link

LeBaux commented Jun 21, 2019

Hey, I am currently on Linux, do you have any plans to make SEOMacrosope platform independent? Or is it tied up with Windows tightly?

I understand Microsoft is the major platform here, I am not really asking you to build for Linux now. This question would pop-up sooner or later, so I am just snooping if there are future plans.

Speaking of the future, are you planning onto making this paid product eventually? Thanks!

@nazuke nazuke self-assigned this Aug 1, 2019
@nazuke nazuke added the question label Aug 1, 2019
@nazuke
Copy link
Owner

nazuke commented Aug 9, 2019

Hi @LeBaux, apologies for the delay in response, very busy the last few months.

First of all, thank you for your interest in this project, as this is the first Windows application that I've written, and mostly for my own purposes, I did not aim for portability.

However, the project itself may run on Linux. I've had it built and technically running a few times; but it's far from clean. I don't actually have a proper Linux environment to test on right now.

I learnt a lot from this project, and as I said, it was mostly for my own work. I made it available publicly in the event that it may be useful to others.

Going forwards, I have no plans to release this as a paid-for (i.e. supported) product; mostly due to time constraints.

I would be directly competing against the other popular products in this niche ;-)

I wrote this application, because there are a few things (like the HrefLang matrix) that the current offerings didn't do in quite the way that I needed for some projects. It's nice to be able to tailor things to work just the way we want.

There are also things that I would do differently, such as storing crawled data on disk, instead of simply holding it in RAM. That would take a lot of work to implement as things are now, but I may eventually do a complete rewrite, using what I learnt from this round.

I do have one or two other projects on the back burner that are "crawler-based", so I will likely use what I learn there on any future version of SEO Macroscope.

Many thanks,

Jason

@nazuke nazuke added the wontfix label Aug 9, 2019
@LeBaux
Copy link
Author

LeBaux commented Sep 28, 2019

Thank you for the detailed response, much appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants