Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BT Classic and BLE Sniffing does not record RSSI of packet. #18

Open
Bushbaker27 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

BT Classic and BLE Sniffing does not record RSSI of packet. #18

Bushbaker27 opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Bushbaker27
Copy link

First off, amazing code. Great to use and very easy to get going. Was wondering if this addition could be made.

Using a Bladerf 2.0 device to sniff BLE packets. Successfully able grab packet information such as advertising address, angle of arrival, time of arrival, etc. However, the RSSI recording seems to be missing from the packet information delivered to wireshark. I know that this can be hardware or even protocol dependent, but I believe that Bladerf has the capability to record these values. I am hoping to be able to record the RSSI from packets sent advertising and data channels.

I hope to use this value to approximate the location of a device. Please let me know if this is something that is possible to be added. Thanks!

@mikeryan
Copy link
Owner

Hi yes, this is something I plan on adding in the near future. We already collect that info from our automatic gain control (AGC) blocks, so it's really just a matter of stuffing it in the correct place in the packet header.

@Bushbaker27
Copy link
Author

Wow thank you! I'll see if I can get it going myself. If I do, I'll be sure to share my findings. Unfortunately, I am pretty new to packet sniffing but I will do my best.

@mikeryan mikeryan self-assigned this Oct 4, 2023
@mikeryan mikeryan added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants