You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
is it possible to refer to running experiment in the experiment code without providing port number (LocalService) and using Experiment.connect() class method, when an experiment was started from commandline using nnictl with yaml file configuration?
Using call such as nni.Experiment.connect(port = 15010) return current experiment object, and allows to f.e. metrics querying,
I didn't find a way to access the port number of experiment programmaticaly.
The only way is to hardcode port number or pass it as parameter, which is strongly inconvienient.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
is it possible to refer to running experiment in the experiment code without providing port number (LocalService) and using Experiment.connect() class method, when an experiment was started from commandline using nnictl with yaml file configuration?
Using call such as nni.Experiment.connect(port = 15010) return current experiment object, and allows to f.e. metrics querying,
I didn't find a way to access the port number of experiment programmaticaly.
The only way is to hardcode port number or pass it as parameter, which is strongly inconvienient.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions