-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Masked the outputs #124
Comments
I experimented a little bit with masking the input image instead of the masking outputs. I didn't see a significant improvement so I left the model unchanged. The original paper says that masking improves the performance by 2.3 % but they were training their model much longer. |
@deeperdeeper, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks @michalfaber,
I am wondering if still make sense to mask the outputs if we have already masks the input image before. If we remove the outputs mask, we don't still need two build two different graphs for training and testing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: