-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Properties should not be validated #5
Comments
Having the same issue but I really like this kind of validation! I like some sanity check. Safes me from mistyping and from using "legacy" properties too. It is true that currently only checks against master branch however I see this as a nice to have improvement to validate against the different portal versions. Thanks for the good work! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently there is a validation and only existent properties in portal.properties can be encoded.
The problem is that some of them are part of a comment or can be added as new composing them with a suffix + object's class name:
Example 1:
#web.server.protocol=https
Example 2:
#
# Entity level caching for a specific type of value object can be configured
# by using a property name that includes the value object's class name.
#
value.object.entity.cache.enabled.com.liferay.portal.kernel.model.Layout=true
value.object.entity.cache.enabled.com.liferay.portal.kernel.model.User=true
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: