Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Depthstillation on real dataset #8

Open
Salvatore-tech opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Depthstillation on real dataset #8

Salvatore-tech opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Salvatore-tech
Copy link

Salvatore-tech commented Oct 1, 2022

Good evening,
I'd like to reproduce your depthstillation process, but on real dataset called CADDY in order to evaluate some models (pwcnet and raft).
I already extracted the depth maps through MIDAS and depthstilled them, but it seems that the metrics of the models that i trained on these depthstilled data are worsening a lot...
I'm attaching, from top to bottom, computed flow, depth map, original and depthstilled images.

Do you see something strange in them? Any tips about the use case?
Thanks in advance!

brodarski-D_00001_left_00
brodarski-D_00001_left
brodarski-D_00001_left

brodarski-D_00001_left_00

@mattpoggi
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Salvatore-tech,
a few questions:

  1. how many images did you use for training?
  2. are all the images taken in underwater conditions? In our experience, having a large variety in terms of image context helps

@Salvatore-tech
Copy link
Author

Hi @mattpoggi,

  1. I depthstilled 4432/30000 on CADDY at the moment, because it is not a quick process with the hw i have
  2. Yes all the images of the dataset are taken underwater... do i need additional preprocess to use them? (the depthstilled flow i attached above seems not showing great issues despite the underwater env)

I'm attaching a screenshot of the results with RAFT when trained on syntetic dataset and also on dCADDY and as you can see in yellow, the results are not encouraging...
If we compare the first and the second raw on KITTI, the EPE and Fl are worsening a lot.
Between the first and third raw on SINTEL there is no clear trend (sometimes a bit better, sometimes not).

image

@mattpoggi
Copy link
Owner

I'm afraid the main problem is the image content, which is very similar in all the frames used...

@Salvatore-tech
Copy link
Author

Do you think that a feature extraction could lead to better result?
I'm thinking to freeze the weights till the last layer when using the dCADDY

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants