-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does ProxSDP assume decomposition of X...? #65
Comments
If I understand the code in |
Yes, you can have multiple p.s.d. variables in your formulation. So if you have some way to decompose your problem into multiple smaller p.s.d. cones you should try it out. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
That is, instead of assuming one PSD constraint
X in PSDCone()
, we can haveX_1 in PSDCone()
,X_2 in PSDCone()
, etc. Is this how ProxSDP is implemented? Or does it assume one matrix blockX in PSDCone()
?I expect this question to be related to the issue:
Chordal decomposition issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: