Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does ProxSDP assume decomposition of X...? #65

Closed
bcdandurand opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Does ProxSDP assume decomposition of X...? #65

bcdandurand opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@bcdandurand
Copy link

bcdandurand commented Apr 1, 2020

That is, instead of assuming one PSD constraint X in PSDCone(), we can have X_1 in PSDCone(), X_2 in PSDCone(), etc. Is this how ProxSDP is implemented? Or does it assume one matrix block X in PSDCone()?

I expect this question to be related to the issue:
Chordal decomposition issue

@bcdandurand
Copy link
Author

If I understand the code in MOI_wrapper.jl correctly, the possibility of having more than one conic constraint (linear, SOC, and SDP) is allowed for.

@mariohsouto
Copy link
Owner

Yes, you can have multiple p.s.d. variables in your formulation. So if you have some way to decompose your problem into multiple smaller p.s.d. cones you should try it out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants