Code reuse and BSD license. #57
Closed
Frankprog03
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Hello, Not being a license expert, please feel free to use as w you wish. I think if you give proper credit to the book, in the way you prefer, it should be ok. Even more, if you think a better license model could be more useful (in the sense of giving more flexibility), I'm totally open to change it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Hi, said and done. As I said my goal is to not limit redistribution. I hope it helps. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello, I am currently following this tutorial and have a question regarding my project. I am developing a library that incorporates a Vulkan renderer, and I'm utilizing code snippets from the tutorial as a basis for my implementation. In some cases, I heavily modify the code, while in others, I directly copy and paste (e.g., for Java beans classes or records). My intention is to license my library under the LGPL v2.1.
However, I am uncertain about how to appropriately license each individual file, especially those derived from the tutorial. Here are my specific concerns:
I would greatly appreciate any guidance or clarification on the appropriate licensing approach for these different scenarios.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions