Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various issues with running labwc within a VM since moving to wlroots 0.17 #1829

Open
Consolatis opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed investigation required Needs further investigation regression

Comments

@Consolatis
Copy link
Member

Consolatis commented May 18, 2024

This is a collection if issues that were raised since we moved to wlroots 0.17:

Lets use this issue for tracking and close the other ones to keep the information in a single place.

@tranzystorekk
Copy link
Contributor

Tip for anyone passing by: some of these issues can be worked around by more aggresively forcing software rendering e.g. with LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1

@knm100
Copy link

knm100 commented May 24, 2024

Some gtk programs (e.g. helvum) failed to start and Output a GDKmessage.
Gdk-Message: 12:39:18.614:Error 71 (Protocol error) dispatching to Wayland display
Is it also because of this?

@johanmalm
Copy link
Collaborator

Some gtk programs (e.g. helvum) failed to start and Output a GDKmessage. Gdk-Message: 12:39:18.614:Error 71 (Protocol error) dispatching to Wayland display Is it also because of this?

Hard to say. Were you running in VM when you got the message? Have you tried running with LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1?

@knm100
Copy link

knm100 commented May 28, 2024

Helvum can start with LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 in VM

Were you running in VM when you got the message?

yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed investigation required Needs further investigation regression
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants