Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create a separated debuggable scheduler container #350

Merged

Conversation

YamasouA
Copy link
Contributor

@YamasouA YamasouA commented Apr 29, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/area simulator
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

I try to Separate API endpoints and Scheduler.
This PR can build debuggablescheduler Pod.
(But still not work. Only build)
After this PR I try to delete scheduler functions from Server and change endpoints functions to operate scheduler Pod.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #318

Special notes for your reviewer:

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @YamasouA. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Apr 29, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 29, 2024
@YamasouA YamasouA marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2024 15:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

Will take a look during GW

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 2, 2024
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ func CreateOptionForOutOfTreePlugin(outOfTreePluginRegistry runtime.Registry, pl

var versionedcfg *v1.KubeSchedulerConfiguration
var err error
if configFile == nil {
if configFile == nil || *configFile == "" {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make a separate PR for this line change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I separate PR.
fix this PR.
60eff56
configFIle fix PR.
#351

Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test
/retitle create a separated debuggable scheduler container

simulator/Makefile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
simulator/cmd/simulator/Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title build scheduler pod create a separated debuggable scheduler container May 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replace L1-L8 with -

## Running simulator

The simulator requires docker installed in your laptop.
We have [docker-compose.yml](../../docker-compose.yml) to run the simulator easily.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I replaced text
9f03809

func main() {
command, cancelFn, err := debuggablescheduler.NewSchedulerCommand()
if err != nil {
klog.Info(fmt.Sprintf("failed to build the scheduler command: %+v", err))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
klog.Info(fmt.Sprintf("failed to build the scheduler command: %+v", err))
klog.Info(fmt.Sprintf("failed to build the debuggablescheduler command: %+v", err))

@sanposhiho
Copy link
Member

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label May 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Thanks :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho, YamasouA

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 729dc18 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 6, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replace current simulator's scheduler with Debuggable Scheduler
3 participants