Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for .kitspace.yaml as well as kitspace.yaml #345

Open
Tyler-Ward opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Add support for .kitspace.yaml as well as kitspace.yaml #345

Tyler-Ward opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Tyler-Ward
Copy link

Many tools and sites prefix their metadata files with a dot (originaly used to signify to linux to hide files), it might be worth adding support for this for the kitspace.yaml file so it can be easily identified as a metadata file by those viewing a project source.

@kasbah
Copy link
Member

kasbah commented Jun 21, 2021

Might be a good idea. Sticking to one way has it's advantages too though: you get used to what it's called and where it is and can more easily find it. It's always meant to stay human readable and editable so I'm not sure making it a hidden file is the right call.

Some meta files that are not normally hidden include: package.json (JS), cargo.toml (rust), pyproject.toml (python). I admit these are normally the main "project" files and dictated by the language you use so I still might be convinced if enough people would really prefer to hide it.

open-source-rover folks would have preferred to put it in a sub-dir which is another consideration. 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants