POSIX is mentioned nowhere

[Rudxain]

Since this has a big focus on Linux shells, POSIX is something that should be talked about, because it's a standard specification aiming at portability and compatibility.

Perhaps POSIX has already been mentioned, but I couldn't find it. Please let me know if I'm wrong

[jlevy]

Fair point. Will leave this open for a future update.

[matu3ba]

standard specification aiming at portability and compatibility

It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification. Software/Standards not defined for extensibility + external control/librarification becomes bloated or under-specified over time.

If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings.
The most severe ones are that bash has no reliable way to copy cli content (only works for me with v to open in $EDITOR which also always runs command).
No idea, if it works in emacs mode.

[Rudxain]

It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification.

True, specially the lack of extensibility.

If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings.

I totally agree

[Aurenas]

No abre la dirección El mar., 31 de enero de 2023 12:24 a. m., Ricardo Fernández Serrata < ***@***.***> escribió:

…

It fails on both regarding PATH, program lookup and is missing extensibility + external control/librarification. True, specially the lack of extensibility. If you still want to mention it, I would recommend to embed the context and shortcomings. I totally agree — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#769 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5HTMYW74C7WNV77U7CWV2DWVC44BANCNFSM5UJK5ZCA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Rudxain]

@Aurenas

No abre la dirección

¿cuál dirección?