Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152 backbones? #19

Open
ruthvik92 opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@ruthvik92
Copy link

ruthvik92 commented Jul 19, 2021

Hi,
Thank you for your good work. I have a couple of questions:

  1. Did you guys test this network for longer training schedules and see if the difference between regular MaskRCNN holds ? PointRend paper shows that even if used 3x training schedule they still get 1.3%mAP better than regular MaskRCNN.

  2. On the similar lines, were you able to show that the performance difference between a regular MaskRCNN and a BMaskRCNN hold if you use a higher capacity network say, ResNeXt 101 and ResNeXt 152?

@ruthvik92 ruthvik92 changed the title Effect of longer training schedules (3x)? Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152? Jul 20, 2021
@ruthvik92 ruthvik92 changed the title Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152? Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152 bacbones? Jul 20, 2021
@ruthvik92 ruthvik92 changed the title Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152 bacbones? Effect of longer training schedules (3x) and ResNeXt 101 and 152 backbones? Jul 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant