New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reconstruction statements mentioned in the paper #30532
Comments
Hi, thanks for raising an issue! This is a question best placed in our forums. We try to reserve the github issues for feature requests and bug reports. |
@liumc14, you are correct. I open-sourced this code before my paper. Also, to keep the architecture clean, I didn't add the reconstruction statement. But it is pretty straightforward
|
|
Yes, the statement should be re-constructed. But the input to the generator should be the retrieved docs related to the statement. |
@shamanez So the training of reconstructed statements actually involves inputting reconstructed statements, retrieving related documents, and letting the generator generate reconstructed statements based on the relevant documents? Thank you for your advice |
Correct
…On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 12:42 PM, liumc14 ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, the statement should be re-constructed. But the input to the
generator should be the retrieved docs related to the statement.
@shamanez <https://github.com/shamanez> So the training of reconstructed
statements actually involves inputting reconstructed statements, retrieving
related documents, and letting the generator generate reconstructed
statements based on the relevant documents? Thank you for your advice
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#30532 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEA4FGTMZZC6ZSSN744OGBLY73SHXAVCNFSM6AAAAABG5XZ6RSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBTHE3TCMRVGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hello, the data set here is the squad data set, but the three domain data sets created in the paper do not seem to be reflected in the code, and it seems that the reconstruction statements in the three domain data sets disclosed in the paper are in the source and It's the same in target. Why is this? @shamanez
transformers/examples/research_projects/rag-end2end-retriever/utils_rag.py
Line 62 in 73014b5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: