-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Low accuracy of LRCN model #144
Comments
If your data is embedded and labels are available, you can use the following repository: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I'm trying to recreate the results you've mentioned in your medium blog post. I've split the dataset using your scripts, used the default hyper parameters-
1000 epochs
lr = 1e-5, decay - 1e-6
Adam optimizer
But after 60 epochs or so, the results are as follows - (very low accuracy)
131/131 [==============================] - 1315s 10s/step - loss: 3.8444 - acc: 0.1359 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3930 - val_loss: 4.3090 - val_acc: 0.0922 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2879
Can you please clarify if I'm missing something, or I'm supposed to run for 500+ epochs? thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: