New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is a sourceMapPath/Name option considered? #159
Comments
radkodinev
changed the title
Is a
Is a sourcemapPath/Name option considered?
Aug 20, 2014
sourcemapPath
option considered?
radkodinev
changed the title
Is a sourcemapPath/Name option considered?
Is a sourceMapPath/Name option considered?
Aug 20, 2014
+1 Yes, looking for this option too |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Are there any plans for a
sourcemapPath
option (such as in gulp-ruby-sass), or even bettersourceMapName
(as in grunt-contrib-uglify)?I think it would be very useful to be able to control those paths. For instance, in a development environment I would like all the files (
script.coffee
,script.js
,script.js.map
) to reside in the same directory.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: