You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Imagine I have a column with links to projects where you display the project name as the clickable text. It's not possible to sort this column because every link starts with a "<".
Same goes for localized numbers. The float 10,000.00 would be 10.000,00 in German. Gridjs will sort this as a string, therefore totally wrong.
Describe the solution you'd like
The old jQuery datatable package solves it by separating the value where you want to sort by and the display value. I think that could be a great solution. (not the way they do it, tough 😅)
Instead of having to implement a custom sorting algorithm, we could add a new attribute to this object called sortBy or sortValue. If this is set, it will be used to sort the column by.
Supplemantal: Not sure if it's really that easy... unless you add the data via the columns and not via the table-wide data attribute.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I tried to implement the custom sorting algorithm but it creates MUCH redundant code and bloats my tables for a very defaulty case.
Additional context
I'm a Python developer, so I unfortunately can't help with a PR. But the solution could be easy to implement and a huge improvement to your package.
Best
Ronny
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Imagine I have a column with links to projects where you display the project name as the clickable text. It's not possible to sort this column because every link starts with a "<".
Same goes for localized numbers. The float
10,000.00
would be10.000,00
in German. Gridjs will sort this as a string, therefore totally wrong.Describe the solution you'd like
The old jQuery datatable package solves it by separating the value where you want to sort by and the display value. I think that could be a great solution. (not the way they do it, tough 😅)
Instead of having to implement a custom sorting algorithm, we could add a new attribute to this object called
sortBy
orsortValue
. If this is set, it will be used to sort the column by.Supplemantal: Not sure if it's really that easy... unless you add the data via the columns and not via the table-wide data attribute.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I tried to implement the custom sorting algorithm but it creates MUCH redundant code and bloats my tables for a very defaulty case.
Additional context
I'm a Python developer, so I unfortunately can't help with a PR. But the solution could be easy to implement and a huge improvement to your package.
Best
Ronny
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: