You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, and first of all, thanks for your work on Netmaker, it's a nice piece of software :-)
I've been using Nm for a few month, for the ease of use, compared to plain wireguard files :-)
I've recently updated to Netmaker 0.22.0, wich announced some exciting features.
When i updated to 0.22.0, i had a setup allowing me to :
give access to internet to some computers, that lived behind secured networks
create a "private network" between my nas, ip cameras, recording device, so i can access my security cameras through a vm on my NAS when i'm away.
create a 'more secure' network between two instances of homeassistant running on differents locations, allowing them to share a database server.
No big deal, but it was working ! And to avoid any problem with internet access on "iot" devices, i managed to add 0.0.0.0/0 to the egress ranges of the network they connect to, all ran smooth for month, and allowed me to "filter" their access using Squid/DNS Filtering :-)
I updated to 0.22.0 because it was claming it could allow "internet access" on clients, via UI, with no needs to modify iptables rules, i thought "oh sweet !!" :-)
Updated following the doc, all went fine.. but.. the feature i was looking for, is "Pro ONLY" !!! When you want to add 0.0.0.0/0 to any ipv4 network, even if your NM server has got a public IP no filters, and your clients just needs to have those lines in their config (and the servers on his.. that's the problem here..).. it tells you to use "Remote Access Client" feature.. wich i searched, in vain : Pro ONLY as i figured out.
I understand the need for developpers to sell their products, and thought for a moment "Ok, let's see how much is it, i'd spend a few bucks than roll back a snapshot.." (i'm lazy, yeah..)
A very short moment, till i saw the price : 75$ per year.. ?! SaaS Only ?!
Oh, sure, the "Open" version is still there, but, without a feature it 'advertise' as 'new' and a 'Auto PRO installation' for newcomers.. :-)
I re-applied a snapshot, and went back on track.. but, to be honnest, i'll be looking around for a solution that doesn't try to "force" users into a paid (and expensive from my point of view) solution, by rebranding some features "Pro Only" :-)
I think it's ok to add new features over an existing system like Wireguard, be it a nice GUI, or even an easy way to manage inter-networking, and to sell it with support for corporate, but, to cut off some of the core features of a product like Wireguard (that has no problem routing packets to and from 0.0.0.0/0..) in order to sell them as "Remote Access Client", for paid only users, isn't a nice move imho.
I didn't went further, as the "Entreprise" version, seem out of scope, i'm just a "Home User".
Some kind of "HomeLab" liscence could be nice, designed for "home users" with some skills, that wants to keep "hand" on a critical solution such as network security, with a little ease from product like yours :-)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello, and first of all, thanks for your work on Netmaker, it's a nice piece of software :-)
I've been using Nm for a few month, for the ease of use, compared to plain wireguard files :-)
I've recently updated to Netmaker 0.22.0, wich announced some exciting features.
When i updated to 0.22.0, i had a setup allowing me to :
No big deal, but it was working ! And to avoid any problem with internet access on "iot" devices, i managed to add 0.0.0.0/0 to the egress ranges of the network they connect to, all ran smooth for month, and allowed me to "filter" their access using Squid/DNS Filtering :-)
I updated to 0.22.0 because it was claming it could allow "internet access" on clients, via UI, with no needs to modify iptables rules, i thought "oh sweet !!" :-)
Updated following the doc, all went fine.. but.. the feature i was looking for, is "Pro ONLY" !!! When you want to add 0.0.0.0/0 to any ipv4 network, even if your NM server has got a public IP no filters, and your clients just needs to have those lines in their config (and the servers on his.. that's the problem here..).. it tells you to use "Remote Access Client" feature.. wich i searched, in vain : Pro ONLY as i figured out.
I understand the need for developpers to sell their products, and thought for a moment "Ok, let's see how much is it, i'd spend a few bucks than roll back a snapshot.." (i'm lazy, yeah..)
A very short moment, till i saw the price : 75$ per year.. ?! SaaS Only ?!
Oh, sure, the "Open" version is still there, but, without a feature it 'advertise' as 'new' and a 'Auto PRO installation' for newcomers.. :-)
I re-applied a snapshot, and went back on track.. but, to be honnest, i'll be looking around for a solution that doesn't try to "force" users into a paid (and expensive from my point of view) solution, by rebranding some features "Pro Only" :-)
I think it's ok to add new features over an existing system like Wireguard, be it a nice GUI, or even an easy way to manage inter-networking, and to sell it with support for corporate, but, to cut off some of the core features of a product like Wireguard (that has no problem routing packets to and from 0.0.0.0/0..) in order to sell them as "Remote Access Client", for paid only users, isn't a nice move imho.
I didn't went further, as the "Entreprise" version, seem out of scope, i'm just a "Home User".
Some kind of "HomeLab" liscence could be nice, designed for "home users" with some skills, that wants to keep "hand" on a critical solution such as network security, with a little ease from product like yours :-)
Best regards, keep the good work,
DINET Joen
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions