Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why the odometry is faster than SC-PGO, and when the odometry finished, the SC-PGO doesn't work even the optimization not finished! #3

Open
cuge1995 opened this issue Aug 13, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@cuge1995
Copy link

No description provided.

@gisbi-kim
Copy link
Owner

thanks for using our project.

  1. PGO uses only keyframes (e.g., equidistant) to mitigate heavy optimization burdens while odometry publishes every all (e.g., 10Hz) motion estimations
  2. SC-PGO internally runs isam2 optimization so if you have many nodes and factors, the odometry and pgo seem not to be quite synchronized, but I expect the pgo would soon converge and finish if you wait a little time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants