Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2020. It is now read-only.

Self-hosting solution #103

Open
lourot opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Self-hosting solution #103

lourot opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lourot
Copy link
Member

lourot commented Aug 17, 2018

There seems to be a demand for a script to be run by the user (with their own GitHub API key). This script would generate a static profile that the user would host themself. See https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/97zj6t/ghuserio_better_github_profiles/e4cbbus

@lourot lourot added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 17, 2018
@jayvdb
Copy link

jayvdb commented Aug 18, 2018

This would also be useful for orgs, to self host in the org space for all their contributors, perhaps with an option to filter to a subset of repos.

@brillout
Copy link
Collaborator

@jayvdb @xiegeo @clarkzjw @styfle

We are curious: Why you want a self hosted version?

@styfle
Copy link
Contributor

styfle commented Sep 14, 2018

If there is a self-host option, typically that means a few things:

  1. There is good documentation for how to build, run, and deploy the code
  2. Usually this means there's a Dockerfile and maybe even a built image on Docker Hub
  3. It makes it easy to fork the project if the authors are no longer maintaining it (in the future)

@xiegeo
Copy link

xiegeo commented Sep 14, 2018

@brillout Because "We're overloaded at the moment and we can't handle any new profile request. " I don't have to request if I can spin my own.

@lourot lourot mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2018
@m1guelpf
Copy link

@brillout Also I could, for example, have this run in a CI and generate a static site with my contribs

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants