Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Incorrect First Activity Date when using en-GB date format #2829

Open
winklevos opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[BUG] Incorrect First Activity Date when using en-GB date format #2829

winklevos opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@winklevos
Copy link

winklevos commented Jan 6, 2024

Important Notice

The issue tracker is ONLY used for reporting bugs. New features should be discussed in our Slack community or in Discussions.

Incomplete or non-reproducible issues may be closed, but we are here to help! If you encounter difficulties reproducing the bug or need assistance, please reach out to our community channels mentioned above.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation!

Bug Description

Holding First Activity date shows the day before the earliest activity when using en-GB

To Reproduce

  1. Set user Locale to en-GB
  2. Create activity for anything on 01/01/2024
  3. View the holding overview
  4. See First Activity is date -1

Expected behavior

First Activity should match the first activity under the holding.

Screenshots

image

Logs

Environment

  • Ghostfolio Version 2.34.0
  • Self-hosted
  • Experimental Features disabled
  • Browser Firefox 121.0 and Edge 120.0.2210.91
  • OS Windows 11

Additional context

Looks that some areas aren't considering the activity date is stored in UTC, "date": "2023-12-31T14:00:00.000Z",

@karter16
Copy link

ahhhh is this what causes this issue. I've been trying to hunt this down for ages. will experiment.

@will76
Copy link

will76 commented Apr 2, 2024

Same bug here using pt locale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants