Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce make targets for setup/restore local-manual-setup in mcm-providers #865

Open
5 tasks
himanshu-kun opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks
Labels
area/usability Usability related exp/beginner Issue that requires only basic skills kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension priority/2 Priority (lower number equals higher priority)

Comments

@himanshu-kun
Copy link
Contributor

himanshu-kun commented Nov 6, 2023

How to categorize this issue?

/area usability
/kind enhancement
/priority 2

What would you like to be added:

#846 introduced make targets in MCM Makefile to ease setting up dynamic variables for local testing of MCM and MCM-providers. But such make targets should be added in mcm-provider Makefile also as their development could be done standalone, and thus should not depend on MCM make targets. The README.md(for example provider-aws) files under mcm-providers should be updated as well

Why is this needed:
Ease of development

@himanshu-kun himanshu-kun added the kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension label Nov 6, 2023
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/usability Usability related priority/2 Priority (lower number equals higher priority) labels Nov 6, 2023
@himanshu-kun himanshu-kun added the exp/beginner Issue that requires only basic skills label Nov 6, 2023
@piyuagr piyuagr assigned piyuagr and unassigned piyuagr Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/usability Usability related exp/beginner Issue that requires only basic skills kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension priority/2 Priority (lower number equals higher priority)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants