Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

toolbox testsuite fails on debian bookworm #2138

Open
prudhomm opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

toolbox testsuite fails on debian bookworm #2138

prudhomm opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@prudhomm
Copy link
Member

prudhomm commented Jul 10, 2023

The toolbox testsuite fails on debian bookworm here :

More precisely the solver is configured to use gamg and it fails for debian:12 using petsc 3.18.
Note that it worked in previous version, there is a chance that it is a PETSc bug.
Changing to pc-type=lu fixes the testcase.

@prudhomm prudhomm self-assigned this Jul 10, 2023
prudhomm referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
need to investigate gamg failure @vincentchabannes

skip feelpp skip tests
@prudhomm
Copy link
Member Author

@vincentchabannes I discussed with @prj- , he confirmed that in PETSc 3.18 there is internal changes in gamg that could broke the solver. @prj- will have a look at a mail discussion that discussed these issues. It seems that we were not the only ones hit by this. there are also changes between 3.8 and 3.19 that we will need also to tackle

@prj-
Copy link
Contributor

prj- commented Jul 11, 2023

(I'm still looking for the proper PETSc thread 😓)

@prj-
Copy link
Contributor

prj- commented Jul 11, 2023

There we go! https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2023-April/048337.html

@prudhomm
Copy link
Member Author

that's interesting because it is exactly the same benchmark we use ! NAFEMS LE10

@prudhomm
Copy link
Member Author

here is an interesting answer regarding how to play with the new options
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2023-April/048366.html

@prj-
Copy link
Contributor

prj- commented Jul 12, 2023

that's interesting because it is exactly the same benchmark we use !

That's an uncanny coincidence indeed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants