diff --git a/notes/2024/2024-03-21-transcript.md b/notes/2024/2024-03-21-transcript.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..19ee9ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes/2024/2024-03-21-transcript.md
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+# 03/21/2024 ESLint TSC Meeting Transcript
+
+**nzakas:** Hi everyone!
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Hi!
+
+**fasttime:** Hi!
+
+**nzakas:** Looks like everyone is here, so let's get started.
+
+**nzakas:** I'll start by going over action items from last time to refresh all of our memories.
+
+**nzakas:** 1) Adding more columns to the triage board and notifying everyone. That was my action item. I did add the columns but didn't have time to send the email. I'll plan on doing that next week.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** 2) Moving AST traversal into Source. Also an action item for me to continue working on that, and I believe it's now ready for final review.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Changes in the core LGTM. I'm not 100% sure about the three rules. Given that this will be a prerelease, I think we can merge it so that rule authors can update their rules. I could verify the three rules next week and submit PRs if there's anything that should be updated.
+
+**nzakas:** Let's hold that discussion until we talk about the v9 status
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** 3) Modify the repos to dismiss stale reviews. That was @mdjermanovic's action item, and I believe I saw a note in <#688770853588172860> that was completed?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yes, that one is done.
+ * 👍 @nzakas, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, those were the action items from last time, so we're in pretty good shape.
+
+**nzakas:** We don't have any issues or PRs tagged for the meeting, or any agenda items on the meeting issue, so we can jump right into v9 planning.
+
+**nzakas:** https://github.com/orgs/eslint/projects/4/views/2
+
+**nzakas:** So it looks like we're basically where we were a couple weeks ago.
+
+**nzakas:** Let's start with the AST traversal PR: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/18167
+
+**nzakas:** from @mdjermanovic earlier:
+> Changes in the core LGTM. I'm not 100% sure about the three rules. Given that this will be a prerelease, I think we can merge it so that rule authors can update their rules. I could verify the three rules next week and submit PRs if there's anything that should be updated.
+
+**nzakas:** That sounds good to me. 2/3 of the rules were pretty straightforward changes, it's really `constructor-super` that I think needs some deeper analysis.
+
+**fasttime:** I could also have a look at the rules when the rest of the core related changes is merged.
+ * 👍 @nzakas, @mdjermanovic
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I've already checked changes in the core, so I'll merge the PR after the meeting
+ * 👍 @nzakas
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, so we've agreed to merge the changes and revisit any rule updates afterwards.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Next item: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/17579
+
+**nzakas:** @fasttime where are we with this one?
+
+**fasttime:** Not much progress on this from my side, I have tried doing some changes but I don't expect to get this finished for the next couple of weeks. I'd suggest we remove it from the v9 board and I'll keep looking into ways to fix this.
+ * 👍 @nzakas, @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, let's move this to v10 so we have time to dig in.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Next: https://github.com/orgs/eslint/projects/4/views/2?pane=issue&itemId=54193976
+
+**nzakas:** There is a PR with a bunch of outstanding feedback, so hopefully this is close?
+
+**fasttime:** I've been reviewing this the last days and I think it looks good now. There are just of couple of questions I'm not 100% sure about because I couldn't find any related discussions.
+
+**nzakas:** Feel free to at-mention anyone you need to get those answered. I'd like to get this merged soon.
+
+**fasttime:** See here: https://github.com/eslint/create-config/pull/81#issuecomment-2013224501
+
+**nzakas:** I can take a look offline, but I'm not very familiar with how this works so not sure of the answers personally.
+
+**fasttime:** Thanks, anyway this should be good to go soon.
+
+**nzakas:** Sounds good.
+
+**nzakas:** Last one: https://github.com/eslint/eslint.org/issues/507
+
+**nzakas:** Not sure if @snitin315 is away but there hasn't been an update in three weeks.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** There are a few things to address. Looks like Nitin will be away for some time so I could take over the PR to finish if he can't at the moment.
+ * 👍 @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Sounds like a good plan. It looks like we're close?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yes, shouldn't take much time
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, we'll have @mdjermanovic drive that one to completion. Thanks!
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Given this state, do we want to do rc.0 for this week's release? I think the core will be feature complete as the outstanding issues are `@eslint/create-config` and the playground.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yeah, I think we could bump to a rc as notice that `eslint` is feature-complete
+ * 🎉 @nzakas
+
+**fasttime:** Sounds good
+
+**nzakas:** Great, we've agreed that this week's release will be the first release candidate 🎉
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** While we're on the subject, let's talk about the release.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I can tomorrow. I could also be here to help if @fasttime would like to try. 🙂
+ * 👀 @nzakas
+
+**fasttime:** Yeah, I was about to say that. I could try to do a release but would like someone with more experience to be around in case I get stuck.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Of course
+
+**nzakas:** Sounds like a plan.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I'm available tomorrow from today's meeting time (9pm CET)
+
+**fasttime:** That's fine 👍
+
+**fasttime:** So we can start with the release by that time tomorrow.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Deal
+
+**nzakas:** As a heads up, we might have some other packages to release: https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint+label%3A%22autorelease%3A+pending%22+
+
+**mdjermanovic:** There are no user-facing changes in `eslint-visitor-keys`, so I think that one isn't necessary to release
+
+**mdjermanovic:** `eslint-scope` had a refactor in the production code, so it might be good to release it to check if everything is okay
+ * 👍 @fasttime
+
+**mdjermanovic:** `generator-eslint` and `eslint-transforms` nothing user-facing I believe, so we can skip them
+
+**nzakas:** We may want to revisit our release-please setup to avoid generating releases if commits don't affect users.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** And I'm not sure about `create-config`
+
+**nzakas:** I think we hold off on create-config until the flat config changes are merged
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**mdjermanovic:** That's a bit complicated, we should probably revisit commit tags
+
+**nzakas:** Do you want to take it as action item to propose an update to how we do this?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** We're using some tags for changes that affect users and changes that don't affect users
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yes, I could take that task
+ * 👍 @nzakas
+
+**nzakas:** Thanks, that would be helpful. Maybe just put together an issue and we can comment on it.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**mdjermanovic:** So, for tomorrow we'll have `eslint-scope`, `@eslint/js` and `eslint`?
+
+**fasttime:** I'd say yes, create-config can wait...
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Agreed
+ * 👍 @fasttime
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Have we done contributor pool for February?
+
+**nzakas:** I was just going over the notes and wondering the same thing. Indeed, we did not.
+
+**nzakas:** https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint+label%3A%22contributor+pool%22+merged%3A2024-02-01..2024-02-29+
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Seems we forgot that in the last meeting
+
+**nzakas:** We were overly excited about @fasttime joining 🙂
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+ * 😄 @sam3k_, @fasttime
+
+**fasttime:** Thanks, hopefully nobody will regret that decision!
+
+**nzakas:** Not so far!
+
+**nzakas:** So looks like DMartens was busy in February. Maybe $600 for the three PRs?
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** StyleShit had two for `use-isnan`. $250?
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** MichielPeter -- this one was open for a year and half!
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yeah, it was blocked at the time
+
+**nzakas:** I feel like we should give a bit more for sticking with it.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**fasttime:** Looks like a lot of work
+
+**nzakas:** Does $500 seem like enough? @mdjermanovic you reviewed this one, so appreciate your insights on this.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** $500 sounds good to me
+
+**nzakas:** All right, I'll take the action item to let them know.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Last thing on my end: I should be mostly back to a regular schedule next week now that my dad is out of the hospital.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Anything else anyone would like to discuss?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Nothing in particular for today
+
+**fasttime:** Nothing from my end
+
+**nzakas:** All right, let's call it a meeting. Thanks everyone!
+
+**fasttime:** Thanks, take care!
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Thanks! 👋