-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[馃悤 Batch]: Use Mamba instead of Conda environments in Ersilia #1062
Comments
May I work on this issue @DhanshreeA ? |
Hey @anshikavashistha thank you for your comment. This issue is currently only under discussion, and will affect several key areas within ersilia. So we might not open it to outside contributions just yet. |
No problem @DhanshreeA |
Update based on discussion:
|
Summary
Just one word: Speed.
Objectives
Conda is painfully slow, and Mamba is increasingly becoming popular as a significantly faster alternative to Conda, so much so, it now ships as a configurable solver with Conda as well. So either we can use Mamba entirely, or at the very least shift to using Mamba as a default solver in model environments that Ersilia creates.
Documentation
https://micromamba-docker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quick_start.html#running-commands-in-dockerfile-within-the-conda-environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: