You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi ✋.
We've wanted to use the AWS dynamodb as persistent storage for our Orleans application. But, we have encountered a limitation that prevents us from fully use its advantages.
As I understand, at this time Orleans doesn't provide native support for storing transactional state in DynamoDB.
Please let me know if there are any existing works or alternative approaches to achieve our purpose.
As mentioned here, I found that there need to specify seperate storage for TransactionalState
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi ✋.
We've wanted to use the AWS dynamodb as persistent storage for our Orleans application. But, we have encountered a limitation that prevents us from fully use its advantages.
As I understand, at this time Orleans doesn't provide native support for storing transactional state in DynamoDB.
Please let me know if there are any existing works or alternative approaches to achieve our purpose.
As mentioned here, I found that there need to specify seperate storage for TransactionalState
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions