-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Potential relaxation of indentation requirements for type extensions #16988
Labels
Milestone
Comments
I would assume this is "by design" with current rules, and this will need change in the lexer(?) spec. Maybe @auduchinok can chime in with more details. |
Some discussion happened in fsharp/fslang-suggestions#1273 |
I think we would require a specific language suggestion here for this feature, to define what exactly is allowed/disallowed |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In writing a type extension without remembering the typical syntax I arrived at something like:
Which gives the error:
The error is clear enough and I was able to quickly fix the problem by indenting
if
beyond thes
instatic
, however it seems like a situation where the indentation requirements could be loosened back to thewith
keyword.Describe the solution you'd like
The above code could be made to compile without errors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another thing that could be done is moving the "Try indenting this further." part of the message to the start, as the proposed solution may not fit on the screen with inline errors (see attached screenshot)
I'm happy enough with the standard syntax:
Additional context
related: #11481
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: